Compliance6 min read

TEC 57015 & 57025 explained

Two standard numbers you’ll meet in every Indian IPTV compliance conversation. Here’s what TEC 57015 and 57025 actually cover, in plain terms, and why they’re deliberately separate.

Behind the paperwork of Indian IPTV compliance sit two TEC (Telecommunication Engineering Centre) specifications. Knowing which is which — and why they’re separate — makes the whole compliance picture click.

The two standards

Why they're separate

CAS decides whether a device may watch; SMS decides who the subscriber is and what they pay for. Keeping them as separate, reconciling systems is both a design principle and a compliance expectation — it’s what lets an auditor verify each independently and catch drift between them.

How they work together

The SMS holds the subscriber and their entitlements; the CAS enforces those entitlements at playback. They must agree — every active subscriber in SMS should have matching CAS entitlements, and vice-versa. Continuous reconciliation between the two is what keeps counts honest and audits clean.

Where Schedule-X sits on top

These standards are the CAS+SMS base; Schedule-X adds the stricter IPTV/DRM obligations (fingerprinting, retention, watermarking) on top. Together they define a compliant platform.

How HySky maps to them

HySky’s CAS (to 57015) and SMS (to 57025) are separate, reconciling services with a shared tamper-evident audit trail — so each standard’s requirements are met and independently provable.

Lessons

This is the kind of problem HySky is built around.

Talk to a team that runs a live operator, not just sells software.

WhatsApp us